Six Toronto police officers arrested and charged in a sweeping corruption probe by York Regional Police last month were scheduled to appear in court Tuesday â most for the first time â except the courtroom was largely empty, save for the Crown judges and their lawyers.Â
Their absences arenât actually against the law. But because this is a high-profile case and none of the officers scheduled to appear Tuesday are in custody, questions persist about when theyâll finally make a public appearance.
Hereâs what you need to know:Â
Six Toronto police officers, one of whom is retired, and seven civilians had court appearances scheduled for Tuesday.
The officers scheduled to appear were:
The officersâ charges range from conspiracy to obstruct justice to drug trafficking.Â
Toronto police officers face corruption, conspiracy charges in organized-crime probe
None of the officers were in court Tuesday because they got their lawyers to file a designation of council for them.Â
That designation means they can skip out on a chunk of their court proceedings and have their lawyer â or sometimes another appointed counsel under them, like a paralegal â show up for them instead, as outlined in the Criminal Code. Anyone accused of a crime can file for a designation, according to the code.Â
They will eventually need to be present when a jury is being selected, if a witness takes the stand to provide oral evidence and when their sentence gets handed out, among other criteria laid out in the code.Â
A designation is not unusual and is âentirely normal,â said Alison Craig, a Toronto criminal defence lawyer.Â
â[In] the first few court appearances of any case, nothing of substance happens,â she said.Â
âReally itâs more of a convenience issue than anything for most people. But certainly I suspect in high-profile cases many accused persons just donât want their face to be out there.âÂ
Craig did mention that filing for a designation requires some level of organization and funding and not everyone could have those resources secured in time for their first court appearance, especially if they are relying on legal aid rather than a private lawyer.
Out of all the officers charged in the investigation, only one is actually in custody. All the others were released on undertakings by police. Â
This means that when they got arrested and charged, they did not have to remain in custody and try to get bail. Instead, they were released by police with a requirement to obey certain conditions and attend court at a later date, according to the Ontario Court of Justice website.
Const. Timothy Barnhardt is the only officer in custody. He was denied bail and faces 17 charges, the most out of all the officers involved.Â
Barnhardt is co-accused on many of his charges with Brian Da Costa, 43. Da Costa, a civilian, is alleged to have connections with various criminal networks and is accused of leading a plan to run illegal cannabis dispensaries, according to his charges.
York police Deputy Chief Ryan Hogan previously called Barnhardt the âgenesisâ of the investigation. Police also allege Barnhardt released confidential information to criminals to help facilitate targeted shootings.
âI do have some questions about the fact that they were all released on an undertaking,â said Craig.Â
Although many of the charges for the officers arenât the most serious, she said, they are part of a very âserious set of allegations that seem to have at least tones of organized crime or conspiracy behind them.â  Â
âI think they were all very lucky and perhaps given some special treatment that the public would not ordinarily be given,â she said.
CBC News did ask York Regional Police why the decision was made to release all officers except Barnhardt on undertakings, but they declined to comment, citing the ongoing investigation.Â
âRealistically, the first time youâre likely to see these guys is either on the day of their guilty plea or on the day of their trial,â said Craig.Â
It could take months â if not years â to get to a trial, she said.Â
âUnless one of the officers has a burning desire to plead guilty in a fairly prompt fashion, which I suspect is not the case, the public is unlikely to see these guys until their trial.â










